They create their own justice, both have good intentions but in a bad way. They kill people that deserves to die.
The overall vibe and artistic elements of A Killer Paradox remind me of Inspector Koo. Some of the character's reasonings are similar, but coming from different motivations. A Killer Paradox focuses more on the killer, while Inspector Koo focuses more on the person trying to catch the killer. Both are great a-typical cat-and-mouse chases.
Both shows explore the minds and actions of people. Exploring the question of what is truly good and bad and what humanity is out of these two are very deep in both shows. I think an important factor in both shows is the initial desperation for money, which in that point in time equates to survival.
The filming and vibes of both shows make it hard for the audience to tell if a scene actually happened or if it was simply a hallucination/imaginary.
I don't want to spoil the show so I can't say much more but if you like one of these you will like the other.
The filming and vibes of both shows make it hard for the audience to tell if a scene actually happened or if it was simply a hallucination/imaginary.
I don't want to spoil the show so I can't say much more but if you like one of these you will like the other.
One day, the MLs of these dramas happen to make a small mistake, and from that, everything in their respective lives changes. They keep making choices, some smart and some not so much, and depending on their respective luck, things continue happening and changing their whole lives around.
Setting - both happen in legal 'verse, one including detectives, the other the justice system, both include crimes, both try very hard to be noir.
Setting - both happen in legal 'verse, one including detectives, the other the justice system, both include crimes, both try very hard to be noir.